阅读材料
Solid-State Batteries: The Future of Energy Storage?
In recent years, as the demand for portable electronics, electric vehicles (EVs), and renewable energy storage grows exponentially, the search for more efficient and reliable battery technologies has become a top priority. Among the emerging contenders, solid-state batteries have emerged as a promising candidate, sparking significant interest in the scientific community and industry alike.
Traditional lithium-ion batteries, which have dominated the market for decades, use a liquid electrolyte to facilitate the movement of ions between the anode and cathode during charging and discharging. While these batteries have powered our smartphones, laptops, and many EVs to date, they come with several limitations. For one thing, the liquid electrolyte is flammable (易燃的), posing a safety risk, especially in high-temperature or overcharging conditions. There have been reports of lithium-ion batteries catching fire in some electric vehicles, which understandably raises concerns among consumers.
Solid-state batteries, on the other hand, replace the liquid electrolyte with a solid one. This seemingly simple substitution brings about a host of advantages. Firstly, the solid electrolyte is non-flammable, drastically enhancing the safety profile of the battery. It reduces the likelihood of thermal runaway (热失控), a dangerous chain reaction that can occur in lithium-ion batteries and lead to fires or explosions. Secondly, solid-state batteries can potentially offer higher energy density. This means they can store more energy in the same amount of space, which is crucial for applications like electric vehicles, where maximizing range on a single charge is a key selling point. With a higher energy density, EVs equipped with solid-state batteries could travel longer distances without needing to recharge as frequently.
Another significant benefit lies in the charging speed. Solid-state batteries have the potential to be charged much faster than their liquid-based counterparts. In theory, it could take only a matter of minutes to get a significant charge, similar to filling up a gas tank, rather than the hours it sometimes takes to fully charge a conventional lithium-ion battery-powered EV. This rapid-charging capability would make electric vehicles even more appealing and practical for everyday use, eliminating “range anxiety” for many drivers.
However, despite these advantages, the development and commercialization of solid-state batteries are not without challenges. One major hurdle is cost. Currently, the materials and manufacturing processes required to produce solid-state batteries are expensive. For example, some of the specialized solid electrolytes and the precision fabrication techniques needed to assemble the batteries drive up the price tag. This makes it difficult for solid-state batteries to compete with the relatively inexpensive lithium-ion batteries in the short term.
Moreover, there are technical issues related to the interface between the solid electrolyte and the electrodes. Ensuring a seamless connection that allows for efficient ion transfer over the long term is still an area of active research. Scientists and engineers are working tirelessly to overcome these obstacles, and significant progress has been made in recent years.
In conclusion, while solid-state batteries hold great promise for revolutionizing energy storage and powering our future, there is still a long way to go before they become mainstream. But with continued research and investment, it's likely that we'll see these advanced batteries powering our cars, homes, and portable devices in the not-too-distant future.
问题设置
What has been the dominant battery technology for decades according to the text?
A. Solid-state batteries
B. Lithium-air batteries
C. Traditional lithium-ion batteries
D. Sodium-ion batteries
Why do traditional lithium-ion batteries pose a safety risk?
A. Because they have a low energy density.
B. Because the liquid electrolyte is flammable.
C. Because they are difficult to recycle.
D. Because they charge too slowly.
What is NOT an advantage of solid-state batteries?
A. Higher energy density
B. Faster charging speed
C. Non-flammable electrolyte
D. Low cost
What makes it hard for solid-state batteries to compete with traditional lithium-ion batteries currently?
A. Their limited energy storage capacity.
B. The complex manufacturing process and high cost.
C. Their slow charging speed.
D. The instability of the solid electrolyte.
In which area is there still a need for further research regarding solid-state batteries?
A. Improving energy density.
B. Reducing the size of the battery.
C. Perfecting the interface between the solid electrolyte and the electrodes.
D. Increasing the charging speed even more.
What is the author's attitude towards the future of solid-state batteries?
A. Pessimistic
B. Optimistic
C. Indifferent
D. Doubtful
答案解析
答案：C。细节理解题。根据文中“Traditional lithium-ion batteries, which have dominated the market for decades”可知，统治市场数十年的是传统锂离子电池，故选 C。
答案：B。细节理解题。由“For one thing, the liquid electrolyte is flammable (易燃的), posing a safety risk”可知，传统锂离子电池存在安全风险是因为液态电解质易燃，答案为 B。
答案：D。细节理解题。文中提到固态电池的优点有：更高的能量密度、更快的充电速度、不易燃的电解质，而当前其面临的问题是成本高，并非优势，所以选 D。
答案：B。细节理解题。从“One major hurdle is cost. Currently, the materials and manufacturing processes required to produce solid-state batteries are expensive.”可知，目前固态电池难以与传统锂离子电池竞争是因为其制造工艺复杂、成本高，选 B。
答案：C。细节理解题。根据“Moreover, there are technical issues related to the interface between the solid electrolyte and the electrodes. Ensuring a seamless connection that allows for efficient ion transfer over the long term is still an area of active research.”可知，在固态电解质与电极之间的界面方面仍需进一步研究，选 C。
答案：B。观点态度题。由“In conclusion, while solid-state batteries hold great promise for revolutionizing energy storage and powering our future”可知，作者认为固态电池有望革新储能，对其未来持乐观态度，选 B。
难词
exponentially /ˌekspəˈnenʃəli/ adv. 以指数方式
electrolyte /ɪˈlektrəlaɪt/ n. 电解质
anode /ˈænəʊd/ n. 阳极
cathode /ˈkæθəʊd/ n. 阴极
flammable /ˈflæməbl/ adj. 易燃的
thermal /ˈθɜːml/ adj. 热的
runaway /ˈrʌnəweɪ/ n. 逃跑；失控
fabrication /ˌfæbrɪˈkeɪʃn/ n. 制造；制作
短语
a top priority 首要任务
- 翻译：在当下，找到更高效、可靠的电池技术是首要任务。（In recent years, the search for more efficient and reliable battery technologies has become a top priority.）
pose a risk 构成风险
- 翻译：液态电解质易燃，尤其在高温或过充情况下，构成安全风险。（The liquid electrolyte is flammable, posing a safety risk, especially in high-temperature or overcharging conditions.）
a host of 许多；大量
- 翻译：这种看似简单的替换带来诸多优势。（This seemingly simple substitution brings about a host of advantages.）
in conclusion 总之
- 翻译：总之，虽然固态电池有望革新储能，为我们的未来供能，但在成为主流之前仍有很长的路要走。（In conclusion, while solid-state batteries hold great promise for revolutionizing energy storage and powering our future, there is still a long way to go before they become mainstream.）
句型
Among the emerging contenders, solid-state batteries have emerged as a promising candidate.
- 翻译：在新兴的竞争者中，固态电池已成为有前景的候选者。
- 解析：“Among...”表示“在……之中”，用于引出范围，“emerge as”意为“作为……出现；成为”。
This means they can store more energy in the same amount of space.
- 翻译：这意味着它们能在相同空间内储存更多能量。
- 解析：“This means...”用于解释说明上文内容，后接宾语从句，“store energy”表示“储存能量”。
全文翻译
固态电池：储能的未来？
近年来，随着对便携式电子设备、电动汽车以及可再生能源存储的需求呈指数级增长，寻找更高效、可靠的电池技术已成为当务之急。在新兴的竞争者中，固态电池脱颖而出，成为备受科学界和工业界瞩目的有力候选者。
统治市场数十年的传统锂离子电池在充电和放电过程中，使用液态电解质来促进离子在阳极和阴极之间移动。尽管到目前为止，这些电池为我们的智能手机、笔记本电脑以及许多电动汽车提供了动力，但它们也存在一些局限性。一方面，液态电解质易燃，尤其在高温或过充情况下，构成安全风险。有报道称一些电动汽车中的锂离子电池起火，这自然引发了消费者的担忧。
而固态电池则用固态电解质取代液态电解质。这一看似简单的替换带来诸多优势。首先，固态电解质不易燃，极大地提升了电池的安全性。它降低了热失控的可能性，热失控是锂离子电池中可能发生的一种危险连锁反应，会引发火灾或爆炸。其次，固态电池有可能提供更高的能量密度。这意味着它们能在相同空间内储存更多能量，这对于电动汽车等应用至关重要，因为单次充电的最大续航里程是关键卖点。有了更高的能量密度，配备固态电池的电动汽车无需频繁充电就能行驶更长距离。
另一个显著优势在于充电速度。固态电池有可能比液态电池充电快得多。理论上，只需几分钟就能充入大量电量，就像给油箱加油一样，而不像传统锂离子电池驱动的电动汽车有时需要数小时才能充满电。这种快速充电能力将使电动汽车在日常使用中更具吸引力和实用性，消除许多司机的“续航焦虑”。
然而，尽管有这些优势，固态电池的研发与商业化并非一帆风顺。一个主要障碍是成本。目前，生产固态电池所需的材料和制造工艺都很昂贵。例如，一些特殊的固态电解质以及组装电池所需的精密制造技术抬高了成本。这使得固态电池在短期内难以与相对便宜的锂离子电池竞争。
此外，固态电解质与电极之间的界面还存在技术问题。确保两者之间长期有效的无缝连接以实现高效离子传输，仍是一个活跃的研究领域。科学家和工程师们正在不懈努力攻克这些难题，近年来已取得重大进展。
总之，虽然固态电池有望革新储能，为我们的未来供能，但在成为主流之前仍有很长的路要走。但随着持续的研究和投入，在不久的将来，我们很可能会看到这些先进电池为我们的汽车、家庭和便携式设备供能。
,
